
As the UGC (User-Generated Content) space in advertising continues to explode, the conversation around usage rights is heating up… and for good reason. If you’re a Meta ad buyer, creative strategist, or brand owner sourcing user-generated content to power your e-comm performance, understanding how to lock down perpetual usage rights is no longer up for debate, it’s absolutely necessary to the success of your advertising efforts.
In this blog, we’re cutting through the chaos of creator pricing structures and inconsistent deliverables to get to the bottom of: who owns the content, how usage rights are structured, and what to watch out for when negotiating with creators.
Short answer: it depends on the contract. The right answer: The person, brand, or agency who PAID for the content to be created should always own it (in our opinion).
Once a brand (or agency, or whomever) pays for content, they should retain full ownership of the deliverables. No ifs, ands, or usage fees. The only gray area is whether the creator includes raw footage and B-roll alongside the final edit. That can be negotiable to an extent, but the finished asset? That should be yours outright. Other caveats here are if the creator or influencer is posting to their feeds and the brand is profiting off of their account (name, image, likeness) by running ads via their page (aka Whitelisting). In this case, a monthly usage fee is fair and should be expected. There’s more on this further down in this blog, so keep reading. But keep in mind, in this case, you’re paying to use their account for ads, not paying for the usage of the content itself – there’s a difference.
Too many brands assume payment automatically implies ownership. It doesn’t. Spell it out in writing. Make “full marketing usage rights” a non-negotiable clause in your briefs, contracts, and plain text emails to the creator.
Most UGC creators won’t bring up usage rights unless they’re planning to charge extra. That’s why the one paying for and sourcing the creative needs to bring it up first.
From a creative strategy perspective, you need clean, clear permission to use content wherever and however you want: Meta ads, TikTok ads, mashups, email marketing, product pages, retargeting carousels—the list goes on. Without perpetual rights, you're either limiting your scale, ruining future ad performance by having to turn off an ad that’s working, or risking platform policy violations or legal issues with creators due to breach of contract.
Here’s what to do:
The UGC space is still the wild west. There’s no standard, and every creator’s rate card is different. But here’s what we’re seeing:
This fragmented model may work for influencers or ambassador partnerships. But for performance creative? It’s a logistical nightmare.
Managing dozens of assets with different expiration dates is an operational burden most media buyers don’t have time for. It’s easy to lose track, get dinged for unauthorized usage, or under-leverage great content just to avoid extra fees.
Every brand should aim for usage in perpetuity. No recurring charges. No follow-ups. No confusion.
Here’s how to position it:
Example:
Creator charges $400/video + $200/month for usage.
You counter: “We don’t pay monthly usage fees. We require perpetual usage. Would you do $500 flat for the video with all rights included?”
Nine times out of ten, they say yes.
Why? Because most creators don’t want to lose the deal—and in this oversaturated market, the power has shifted back to brands. If one creator walks, there are ten more ready to shoot tomorrow.
The one caveat to perpetual rights? Whitelisting. If you're running paid ads through the creator’s handle, you’re not buying the content—you’re renting their account. That typically does come with a monthly cost, and it's justified.
Even then, clarify expectations:
Usage rights don’t have to be a headache. The best creative strategists are clear, firm, and consistent:
UGC is powerful. But the ROI only works when you actually own the assets you’re optimizing.
And in this market? Ownership is leverage.